Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
ORNITHOPTER RESEARCH GROUP Home


Dragonfly Flight
 Moderated by: PatriciaJB  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
TedGM
Member
 

Joined: Thu Aug 9th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 20
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Dec 29th, 2007 03:37 pm

Quote

Reply
Damselfly Flight

We can clearly see how it hovers and makes a forward flight. An amazing view of  wings coordination.

 

I THINK THIS VIDEO CAUGHT WHAT WE NEED TO LEARN FROM DRAGONFLY FLIGHT MODES.

 

HAPPY HOLIDAYS,

Ted

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGkZLvung_o
 

 

Last edited on Sat Dec 29th, 2007 03:42 pm by TedGM

Sigurd
Member
 

Joined: Tue Dec 16th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 53
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Dec 20th, 2008 10:05 am

Quote

Reply
Another little paper about stroke phases and stuff:
http://tolweb.org/notes/?note_id=2471

"Counter-stroking is the normal mode for Zygoptera except some Calopterygidae, and for Anisoptera when they are hovering or flying very slowly. This is a very powerful and efficient way of flying and generates a lot of lift.
Phased-stroking is used by Anisoptera when flying about. This method generates more thrust but less lift than counter-stroking.
Synchronised-stroking is used by Anisoptera when maximising thrust to change direction quickly. It is also used by calopterygid Zygoptera as a display flight, showing off the coloured wings.
Gliding is used by some Anisoptera and a few of the very largest Zygoptera (mostly in the family Pseudostigmatidae). Three kinds of gliding can be recognised: free gliding, where an animal just stops stroking with its wings and glides slowly down for a few seconds; updraft gliding at hill crests, where the animal adjusts its wing positioning to float in the air without the need to beat its wings; and gliding in towed females, where a female in the wheel position holds her wings out and glides while the male provides the motive force."

I am not sure where, but I recently read something contradictory; A model that got better lift from 90deg rear wing lead, than from counterstroking.

Last edited on Sat Dec 20th, 2008 10:07 am by Sigurd

PatriciaJB
Administrator


Joined: Tue May 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 303
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Dec 20th, 2008 03:06 pm

Quote

Reply
Sigurd wrote:
I am not sure where, but I recently read something contradictory; A model that got better lift from 90deg rear wing lead, than from counterstroking.


Hi Sigurd,

Yes, several models have shown that 90 degree rear wing lead is better than counter-stroking.

See John Mack's models on my website [on the Ornithopter Researchers Page]
http://www.ornithopter-pilot.com/Ornithopter_Researchers_Forum.html
and also Pete Valentine's double flapper experiments in the test Model section in this forum. http://www.ornithopterresearchgroup.com/view_topic.php?id=87&forum_id=14

I'm going to experiment with 90 to 120 degree rear wing lead in Nightingale.

Cheers,
Patricia


 Current time is 08:03 pm




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez